Sunday’s Obituary – Elizabeth Nagy

Elizabeth Nagy is my husband’s great-great-grandmother.  She moved to the United States with her husband John Nagy from Hungary about 1889.  John and Elizabeth raised their family in and around Whiting, Indiana.

 

Death and Funeral Notices

NAGY – Elizabeth, age 75, of 1235 Steiber St, Whiting, passed away Friday, August 17th at 10:20 a.m. at her house.   Funeral services Monday, August 20th at 2p.m. from Baron Chapel, 1221 119th St, Whiting. Rev George E Francis of the First Methodist church of Whiting officiating.  Burial Elmwood cemetery, Hammond.  Survivors are 2 sons, Andrew of Hammond and John of East Chicago; 2 daughters, Mrs. Louis Radvany and Mrs. Brice Voight, both of Whiting; 13 grandchildren; 1 great-grandchild; 1 sister, Mrs. John Kollarick of Brooklyn, N.Y.

Hammond Times, Hammond, Indiana, August 19, 1945, Page 24, column 1

This obituary is stock full of clues for me to follow-up on.  First I want to see if the First Methodist Church is still in existence.  If so, I am going to contact them to see if they have any information about my husband’s family.  I knew of all of the children’s names but the sister is a surprise.  I need to see if I can find John Kollarick to identify the first name of his wife.  I wonder how many other of Elizabeth’s siblings/family made the trip from Hungary to the United States.  If I am unable to identify where in Hungary Elizabeth immigrated from, maybe another one of her family members will have left a clue!

Motivation Monday – Genealogy Christmas Gift

Do you have any last-minute Christmas gifts to purchase?  If so, consider making an easy genealogy craft that will delight anyone.  I made these family photo coasters for my Grandmother and I know she is going to love them.

The above photos are all related to my Grandmother’s family.  The coasters can be made with any photos.  I am even thinking of making a set for my sister-in-law with photos of her dog. These quick and easy steps will have you creating some for any last-minute gifts you may need.

Supplies:

  • Pack of Travertine tiles from any home improvement store. (I believe I got 9 tiles for $3.49)
  • White tissue paper
  • A square of felt (available at any craft store)
  • Mod Podge (available at any craft store)
  • Acrylic Sealer (also available at any craft store)

The first step is to open your photo in the photo software of your choice.  I then converted each photo to grayscale.  The last step in the photo software is to resize your image to 4″ x 4″ to match the size of the tiles.

Next, I taped a piece of white tissue paper to a piece of regular white paper.  I then printed the image onto the white tissue paper.  Be sure to gently remove the tissue paper from the regular paper so that you do not tear it.  Cut the tissue paper down to the 4″ x 4″ size.

Next, put a layer of Mod Podge onto the tile and carefully place the tissue paper photo on top of it.  Let the Mod Podge dry completely so that the tissue paper does not tear!  Coat each tile with two more layers of Mod Podge being sure to dry completely in between coats.

I then took out my Acrylic Sealer and sprayed each tile with several coats (again drying completely in between layers.)  The sealer helps to prevent the condensation from glasses from ruining the photo beneath.

Lastly, I cut the felt into 4″ x 4″ squares and glued them to the bottom of each tile.

The entire project took one afternoon to complete and I am so happy with the results.  It is such an easy way to share family photos with others.  I am hoping that the coasters create some discussion about our family history.  If anything, it will give me a chance to explain who everyone is and how we are related.

Sodoku Puzzle as Genealogy Proof Standard

While pregnant with my second child I had a difficult time sleeping.  I would spend the those middle of the night hours playing Sudoku on my iPhone until I fell back asleep.

Sudoku is a logic puzzle.  The puzzle board is nine blocks high by nine blocks wide.  There are numbers placed in the puzzle to get you started.  The goal is to place the numbers 1 – 10 in each block, each column, and each row. The difficult part is that the numbers can only appear once In each box, column, and row.

While starting a new board the other night, it occurred to me that a Sudoku puzzle has many parallels to the Genealogy Proof Standard.

1.  Reasonably Exhaustive Search

Sudoku puzzles always begin with pre-positioned numbers to get you started.  When researching your family you begin with the information you know.  The pre-positioned numbers on a Sudoku board give you the clues to what numbers you can place next.  The information you start with in genealogy gives you clues to where to locate more sources.  A genealogist searches for all possible sources to locate more evidence.

2.  Accurate Source Citations

When playing Sudoku it is important to place the numbers into the correct box.  For genealogy, it is important to write out accurate source citations.  The ability for others to reconstruct our research helps to prove our conclusions.  In both cases, it is important to be exact in the details.

3.  Analysis and Correlation of Collected Information

You continually analyze the Sudoku board as you play.  You have to use logic to identify the next open block and the correct number to place in that block.  You have to make sure it is the only number that can fit into that block.  To see if a specific number is the one that fits, you must look at the other numbers in the row, column, and block to make the decision.  Genealogy is similar in that you must look at all of the pieces of evidence in order to make a conclusion.  Each piece of evidence has to be analyzed for information and additional clues.  Together all the pieces (just like the rows, columns, and blocks) lead to the correct answer.

4.  Resolution of Conflicting Evidence

Sometimes you will place a number in the wrong box while playing Sudoku.  Eventually, you will get to a point in the board where a number will not work logically.  At this point, it takes some time but you have to work backwards to find the number that was placed incorrectly.  Once this is done you can again move forward with the correct logical conclusion.  In genealogy it is rare for all of the evidence to say the same thing.  The next step is to take a moment and explain why there are differences in the evidence.  Most are easily explained.  In some cases, it is more difficult but you always need to find out why there is a conflict before you can move forward.

5.  A Written Conclusion

A Sudoku puzzle is finished when you have written numbers in each of the squares so that all of the blocks/rows/columns are filled in.  Likewise with genealogy research, you are not finished until you write out your conclusion.  A written conclusion is important because it ties in all of the above parts of the Genealogy Proof Standard.

I have heard genealogy referred to as a jigsaw puzzle.  I like that analogy but think that a Sudoku puzzle is going to be my personal favorite analogy.  What is your favorite genealogy analogy?

Society Saturday – Putting Money Where Your Mouth Is

One of the fastest ways to make a genealogy society better is to get involved.  I am a member of my local society, Marin County Genealogical Society.  I have been a ‘regular’ member for a couple of years now.  I have attended most of our monthly meetings in the last couple of years.

Recently, our Treasurer announced that she will be moving to a new area and will not be able to remain on our Board.  I decided that it was time to put my money where my mouth is and volunteer to complete the term of the Treasurer position.

We had our monthly meeting the last week of November.  It was awesome that the next day I was already taking checks to the bank.

I am looking forward to being in the Treasurer position.  Next time your society has a position open consider volunteering for it.  You may be surprised how happy it will make you.

Tuesday’s Tip – An Obituary Is Only A Clue

Finding obituaries in newspapers is one of the many tools researchers use on a regular basis.  In my experience, obituaries are a valuable tool as they are usually full of information about a person and their family.

When I find an obituary, I will do my usual document “intake.”  I scan the article to my computer, add source citation to the digital document, transcribe the obituary to a word document, add any information to my genealogy software, again add source citations to each fact, file the digital document in the correct folder, and then add any to-do items to my research log.

I think the last step is the most important (besides citing my sources of course).  An obituary is only as accurate as the person who supplies the information.  I have found several obituaries with incorrect or biased information.  I say biased because the informant wanted to paint a “better” picture than reality.  Some people just don’t know information and some purposely misinform.

I use an obituary as a clue for each piece of information contained in the article.  Every piece of information needs to be checked and verified against other sources.

I recently found an obituary in the Hutchinson Daily New, Hutchinson, Kansas for my maternal grandfather.  He passed away in California.  The obituary probably ran in the local Kansas paper since my grandmother’s family lived in this town.  The obituary had many incorrect facts relating to my grandfather including his age, cause of death, and the names of his two youngest  children.

I am lucky because I have several other sources that confirm the correct information for the mistakes made in the obituary.  It is an important lesson to be aware that sources with secondary information are not always accurate.

I use my research log to not only list my research “finds” but also my “need to find.”  As I analyze a document, I list each source that I need to get my hands on to confirm each fact that I have identified.  Having two small children has done a number on my memory.  The research log allows me to always remember to follow up and deal with any conflicting information.

Happy Hunting!

Happy Thanksgiving!

Today I am thankful for many things including:

  • My family,
  • My ancestors,
  • The stack of old photos my grandmother shared with me the other week (I need to get them scanned to redistribute to family!),
  • My genealogy friends,
  • All of the wonderful people who have helped fill my genealogy requests this year at libraries and government offices around the country,
  • and that I am currently on a tropical island on vacation!
I hope you and yours enjoy a Happy Thanksgiving!

A Case Of Reverse Ageism

In my early thirties, I am almost always the youngest person in the room when I attend anything genealogy related.  When I first joined my local genealogy society, Marin County Genealogical Society, I was intimidated by the room full of people older than me.  I quickly learned that this was my own insecurity as everyone was very welcoming.

I have also realized that age is no issue in my society.  The reality is that there are different levels of experience in researching.  I have learned from some of the people who have years of knowledge to share.  In return, I have shared some of the things I have learned with members who are just starting out.  I love walking into meetings now so I can see the people I consider friends.

At the beginning of November I attended a day long genealogy seminar in the Bay Area.  I had a blast meeting new people and learning new things.  I had only one negative experience during the day and it took me by complete surprise.

At the beginning of the program, the host genealogy society, San Mateo Genealogical Society, announced that their Spring seminar would feature a well-known genealogist, D Joshua Taylor. As I was there to see Tom Jones, I was impressed with the quality of speakers that was on the menu.  At lunch the Spring Seminar was discussed.  One of the women at the table expressed that she would not be attending because she wondered what Josh Taylor would have to offer being so young.  She felt that Tom Jones as a more experienced researcher would be able to teach her new things.

I quickly shut my mouth and counted to three before saying something I would regret.  I then calmly replied that I plan to attend.  I continued that I believe Josh Taylor will have a fresh perspective to offer and that his 15 years of experience was nothing to sneeze at.  I ended by joking that it will be nice to not be the youngest in the room if only by a couple of years. The things running through my head were not very nice so I will not repeat them.

When I got home, I told my husband about the conversation and was shocked at the anger I felt when recounting it.  After processing my feelings, here is what I think about this case of reverse ageism:

1. It will be her loss if she does not attend the Spring seminar.  D Joshua Taylor is a genealogy superstar in the making.  If this woman does not appreciate what he has accomplished under the age of 30, she just doesn’t get it.

2.  I am super thankful that this is the only time I have felt my age was an issue.

3.  The genealogy community has many wonderful younger researchers.  We bring a different perspective that augments the views of the more experienced researchers.

4.  The genealogy community in general is a welcoming, friendly place.

5. Last but not least, if you hear someone making a ridiculous remark about age (young or old) – Speak Up! I did not have to yell or be mean to get my point across.  I don’t know if she got it but there was definitely some acknowledgement from others at the table.

In closing, I learned a lot from Tom Jones at this seminar and look forward to learning a lot from Josh Taylor in the Spring.  Hope to see you there!

The First Story I Wish I Had Not Found

My family (and my husband’s family) has its share of scandal.  I have found stories of slave owners, murder, multiple marriages, illegitimate children, suicide, alcoholism, and teenage pregnancy.  I have never been the kind of researcher who questioned what to do with stories that can cause trouble.  They need to be told just as much as the rest of the story.

I have learned this week that another kind of story also needs to be told.  The gut wrenching, heartbreaking stories of loss in an ancestor’s life are just as influential as any scandalous stories.  I was truly devastated when I found the following news article about the death of two children in a fire.  While I was happy to be able to confirm a family story, I could not help but mourn for Mary Capelli and her children.  I wish I had not been able to find this story because I would never wish a tragedy of this magnitude on anyone.

Every event that occurs during your life helps to shape you as a person.  It is easy to see how this accident shaped the Capelli family.  I now have a reason why the family left coal country for the big city.  I also have some insight into how my grandfather, at age 5, was welcomed as part of the family after arriving in Pittsburgh just a few years later.

This article appeared in The Morning Herald, Uniontown, Pennsylvania on November 24, 1916.

 

CHARRED BODIES OF BABES, ARMS CLASPED TIGHTLY, FOUND IN DEBRIS

 Third Child, Aged Six Months, Tossed From Second Story Window by Mother Who Also Leaped to Ground

(By H.H. Baer)

 

BROWNSVILLE, Nov. 23 – Bodies of two babies, with their charred arms clasped about each other, was the grim spectacle brought to light after the flames had been subdued at the Alicia works Thursday afternoon.  Another baby six months old had been tossed by the mother from the second story of the building and was unhurt.  The mother leaped after the baby and was badly bruised.  Her condition is most serious as a result of the shock when she learned the babies had been burned to a crisp.

THE DEAD

SLAVELLI CAPPELLI, aged 5.

ELMA CAPPELLI, aged 3.

THE INJURED

ELSIE CAPELLI, aged 6 months, injured when she was thrown from the window to the ground; will recover.

MRS. FRED CAPELLI, mother of the babies, bruised when she leaped through the second story window to the ground; condition serious.

Just how the fire started is a mystery.  The large double frame dwelling, nos. 68 and 69, were burned to the ground.  Four other houses across the street were blistered and damaged from the heat of the frames.

All the families are either Italian or Slavish.  A telephone call was received from the W. Harry Brown works to the effect a fire was raging in the company houses.  Both South Brownsville and Brownsville fire trucks, loaded with firemen, went to the scene.  They found one house in flames and others about to ignite.

Water in the fire plugs would not throw a stream five feet.  Chemicals from the trucks were thrown on adjacent houses to save them, while the hose were taken in the second stories and nozzles run over the sides of the houses to keep the flames in check.  It was due to the excellent work of the two fire companies that the entire lower two rows did not burn to the ground.  The Alicia fire company formed a bucket brigade and assisted in quenching the flames, which were fanned by the stiff river breeze.

Mrs. Capelli, whose children were burning to death, dashed from those holding her several times in an effort to rush into the burning building to the relief of the little tots.  Each time she was caught before she accomplished her purpose only to make another effort to enter the building.

Mrs. Capelli was quieted somewhat when told her babies had been saved.  She stated in broken English she was down stairs in the front of the hause [sic] asleep when she was awakened by the smoke choking her.  She rushed up stairs, where her three babies were sleeping in a bed.  She grabbed the smallest child and threw her through a pane of glass from the second story to the ground.  She then made another effort to save the remaining children but was almost suffocated by the heat and smoke.   Finally unable to reach them she threw herself through the window.  Her clothes were singed and her arms and limbs cut by the glass and the jolt of the fall.  The house was then a mass of flames and none dared to enter.

It is thought the fire originated in the kitchen from the cooking stove, having a good start before it was discovered by the residents, although there are 150 houses in the two rows.

Fred Capelli, the husband, was in Brownsville at the time of the fire and his homecoming in the evening at 5:30 o’clock was another sad affair.  The fire started at 1:45 in the afternoon.

When the building had burned to the ground, nothing standing but the two brick chimneys, the charred remains of the little babies were found locked arm in arm.  The bodies were in the basement, having fallen from the second story, but the death lock was not broken.

The theory is advanced by the firemen that the children were suffocated before the fire reached them.  This was also the reason the children did not answer the mother’s summons at the window.

The bodies were taken to the morgue of Kisinger & Luce.  They will be buried together sometime today.  Both will be laid to rest in one little coffin.  Two elder children were attending school at the time of the fire and added to the pitiful scene, when school was dismissed.

The extent of the damages is not known exactly, but estimated to reach $8,000.  Besides the home of Fred Capelli in the house No. 68, the belongings and furniture of John Tompko, in house No. 69, were completely lost.  Martin Yallincich living in house No. 67, suffered heavy loss as did John Superak, living in house No. 66.  House No. 70, Pauls Disi’s residence, all household belongings and furniture was either ruined by fire or chemicals and water.  House No. 71, Steve Paviectovich, suffered slight damage by chemicals and water.

The fire occurred in the “patch” of the Alicia works which are located 150 feet from the river bank.

Company Physician J.H. Lab??? remained with the mother for five ???? administering medicine and ????

All telephone communication between Brownsville and Alicia ??? severed for a short time.  The el??? Current at the plant was shut off ??? wires burned in two.  Those we??? Paired in a short time.

Superintendent Reynolds state??  houses would be rebuilt immed??? and the homeless families sho??? and cared for until their new bu????   was completed.

All men residing in the house ??? employed at the works, either in ??? mines or on the outside.

Wedding Wedesday – Lawbaugh Mitchell Wedding Announcement

I was so excited to find this wedding annoucement on newspaperarchive.com this week.  It features my maternal grandparents.  The timing could not be better as I fly down to Southern California on Monday to visit with my grandma.  I can’t wait to bring her a printed copy as a surprise!

Hutchinson News Herald, June 25, 1950, Page 7, Column 1

 

Wedding vows for Roberta Mitchell, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. D.M. Mitchell, and William H. Lawbaugh, son of Mrs. Effie Lawbaugh of Bell Gardens, Calif., were wed at 8pm Saturday in 10th Avenue Evangelical United Brethren Church by Rev. C.H. Hartmann.  Organist, Mrs. Floyd Leatherman, and Duain Crain, vocalist, gave wedding music.

The church was decorated with two pair of candelabra, greenery and white satin bows.  Geraldine Linegarger of Emporia was maid of honor and Mrs. G.E. Cogzill, sister of the bride, was bridesmaid.  Robert Scruton of Wichita was best man.  Ushers were Raymond Mitchell of Augusta, Delbert and Kenneth Mitchell, brothers of the bride.  Donnie and Connie Cogzill, twin nephew and niece of the bride were rind bearer and flower girl respectively.  Tapers were lighted by Delores McAdams of Wichita and Betty Gragg of Guymon.

The bride wore a gown of white satin trimmed with nylon illusion net and a nylon illusion veil held by a crocheted ruffle.  She wore pearls, gift of the bridegroom, and a white Bible topped with an orchid corsage.

Her attendants wore ballerina gowns of pink and blue, mitts and nylon illusion veils held by crocheted ruffles.  They carried pink corsages on white Testaments.  The taper lighters wore yellow dresses and the flower girl wore a gown of white organza over pink taffeta.  Mrs. Cogzill made the bride’s dress and veil and the attendants veils and mitts.

A reception will be held in the Mitchell home with Mrs. Ruby Elliott of Salina in charge of the guest book.  Mmes  Raymond Mitchell of Augusta, Kenneth and Delbert Mitchell assisted at the reception.

For going away the bride wore a tan silk dress with brown and white accessories.  After short wedding trip the couple will be at home in Wichita where Mr. Lawbaugh is employed by Southwestern Bell Telephone company.  Mrs. Lawbaugh has just completed two years of X-Ray training at Wesley hospital in Wichita.